Posted on 18 October 14 at 04:13, Edited on 18 October 14 at 04:26 by MCmichaelDThe Achievements should be organized by Game as if they were DLC. this would make focusing on 1 "Game" much easier and eliminate the need to scroll down this Colosseum Wall of text embrace it!
Posted on 18 October 14 at 15:22, Edited on 18 October 14 at 15:23 by I've never heard of something like that happen before.And that makes you larger than life
Posted on 18 October 14 at 16:37SandHawkTime said:I've never heard of something like that happen before.no other game has 400 achivementsembrace it!
Posted on 18 October 14 at 18:30, Edited on 18 October 14 at 18:31 by OfficerBarbradyThis is an absolute must. While we're at it, do the same for those HD collections that don't specify which achievements are for which game like Silent Hill HD. They don't need to be considered as a separate DLC or anything for completion, they just need to be separated to specify which achievements are for which game.Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.
Posted on 18 October 14 at 19:07, Edited on 18 October 14 at 19:07 by ZZBroncosIt was not done for The Orange Box
Posted on 18 October 14 at 19:40ZZBroncos said:It was not done for The Orange BoxDoesn't mean it shouldn't be done now. They should do it now for The Orange Box, too. It just makes sense.Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.
Posted on 18 October 14 at 19:47The order one person decides may not be the order someone else wants, xbox.com order is the deciding factor for all games. (then you won stuff is chosen by you)I speak for me, the site speaks for itself
Posted on 18 October 14 at 19:58We're not talking about order. We're talking about separating them into sections, similar to how DLC is separated. Except in this case, it wouldn't change completion percentage.Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.
Posted on 18 October 14 at 20:00That's what I have an xbox to doI speak for me, the site speaks for itself
Posted on 18 October 14 at 20:04I'm convinced that you don't actually understand what's being talked about here. If you do understand, I'm actually baffled that anybody would actually be against this idea to the point of actually arguing against it. There's 0 negatives with this, it would be nothing but helpful. The achievements aren't labelled to specify which game on the disc they're tied to. Manually separating them is something that I'm shocked hasn't already been done. The only reason I could see why anyone would be against it is if they were the ones who would have to go do the labelling but are too lazy to do it.Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.
Posted on 18 October 14 at 20:08I fully understand what you're talking about, im not an imbecileI speak for me, the site speaks for itself
Posted on 18 October 14 at 20:11Then I'd like to know why exactly you're against this idea. I don't see any option on my xbox that lets me label the achievements by games in the compilation discs that share a single achievement list, I'm not sure why you said "That's what I have an xbox to do".Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.
Posted on 18 October 14 at 20:54The game will though, all separated for youI speak for me, the site speaks for itself
Posted on 18 October 14 at 21:01So then why not do this for the games that don't?Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.
Posted on 19 October 14 at 07:35, Edited on 19 October 14 at 07:36 by planting42I have to agree with Spil, not only does 343 claim you can track your progress in the game itself but every other game is listed here in Xbox.com order. There are many games that are compilations that are not specifically separated. Why start with this game? Wouldn't flagging all achievements be a more important task than reorganizing achievement order within games themselves?http://www.trueachievements.com/gtasc-2014.htm
Posted on 19 October 14 at 09:25My suggestion was mainly to do them for every game like this. It'd be much easier for achievement planning before going into a game. I'm surprised it wasn't a feature that was implemented back when compilation discs that share achievement lists became a thing, but it's better late than never. As far as importance compared to flagging goes, I'm sure there's not more than 20 or so of these compilation type games so it's not like it'd be postponing a hugely important construction project for a few years to work on a smaller, less important project. Both flagging and labelling compilation achievements can be worked on easily at the same time, especially if user suggestions can be made for the game labelling. I don't see how this would be anything other than helpful and useful.Don't be a lemon, be a rose bud.