| Author | Message |
|---|
Last post: 19 May at 20:54
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 19:50 |
And yet, lets be honest. It's 75g. and It's gonna be 1200 MSP, like the rest of the bullshit Activision pulls. Right now, MW3 should be up to 1,750G, but it's at 1,385G, so I predict Collection Pack #4 will be 115G, bringing it to 1,500G. You heard it here first.
I'm sick of this ripoff bullshit from Activision. I've paid enough for this BS DLC. I'm not buying a CoD game again. There's plenty other games I can enjoy rather than wasting so much money on this utter tripe.
Activision need to get it into their heads that I don't give a flying fuck about their shit, repetitive multiplayer, so tehy should split the maps up, and just offer them for like 240MSP for each map. It would be much fairer, and cheaper for us. |
Last post: 16 May at 18:39
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 19:58 |
TSG Dwaggie said:And yet, lets be honest. It's 75g. and It's gonna be 1200 MSP, like the rest of the bullshit Activision pulls. Right now, MW3 should be up to 1,750G, but it's at 1,385G, so I predict Collection Pack #4 will be 115G, bringing it to 1,500G. You heard it here first.
I'm sick of this ripoff bullshit from Activision. I've paid enough for this BS DLC. I'm not buying a CoD game again. There's plenty other games I can enjoy rather than wasting so much money on this utter tripe.
Activision need to get it into their heads that I don't give a flying fuck about their shit, repetitive multiplayer, so tehy should split the maps up, and just offer them for like 240MSP for each map. It would be much fairer, and cheaper for us.To be fair to Activision, they market directly to their customers who could give zero shits about achievements or the single player story. |
Last post: 04 Feb at 00:15
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 19:59 |
Oh boy, face off man i sure am glad call of duty added this awesome game mode to keep everything fresh!
/sarcasm. |
Not gonna be happy till more Modest Mouse is in Rb3 |
Last post: Yesterday at 02:01
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 19:59 |
TSG Dwaggie said:And yet, lets be honest. It's 75g. and It's gonna be 1200 MSP, like the rest of the bullshit Activision pulls. Right now, MW3 should be up to 1,750G, but it's at 1,385G, so I predict Collection Pack #4 will be 115G, bringing it to 1,500G. You heard it here first.
I'm sick of this ripoff bullshit from Activision. I've paid enough for this BS DLC. I'm not buying a CoD game again. There's plenty other games I can enjoy rather than wasting so much money on this utter tripe.
Activision need to get it into their heads that I don't give a flying fuck about their shit, repetitive multiplayer, so tehy should split the maps up, and just offer them for like 240MSP for each map. It would be much fairer, and cheaper for us.umad bro? instead of complaining about how much it costs to play games, why dont you go get a job? |
Last post: 13 May at 10:48
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:07 |
| at this rate ill think ill just wait till every dlc has came out, wait 2 years or so and their be on a deal of the week and then ill buy them :) |
haters gunna hate |
Last post: 03 May at 20:43
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:08 |
TSG Dwaggie said:And yet, lets be honest. It's 75g. and It's gonna be 1200 MSP, like the rest of the bullshit Activision pulls. Right now, MW3 should be up to 1,750G, but it's at 1,385G, so I predict Collection Pack #4 will be 115G, bringing it to 1,500G. You heard it here first.
I'm sick of this ripoff bullshit from Activision. I've paid enough for this BS DLC. I'm not buying a CoD game again. There's plenty other games I can enjoy rather than wasting so much money on this utter tripe.
Activision need to get it into their heads that I don't give a flying fuck about their shit, repetitive multiplayer, so tehy should split the maps up, and just offer them for like 240MSP for each map. It would be much fairer, and cheaper for us.150 G when the other one comes out.
its always 150G
get over it. |
Last post: 08 Sep 12 at 15:29
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:14 |
| Heh, that gave me a good chuckle. Vortex = Artillery, U-Turn = Gridlock? |
Last post: 18 May at 17:35
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:42 |
| Ive been having fun p[laing whats on the game already and as much as i love DLC i still havent bought any for this yet but may soon |
Last post: Yesterday at 17:15
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:43 |
| I'm bothered that I can't complete this game without spending the cost of almost a complete new game. Someday I'll buy it... |
Last post: 17 May at 14:12
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:43 |
TSG Dwaggie said:And yet, lets be honest. It's 75g. and It's gonna be 1200 MSP, like the rest of the bullshit Activision pulls. Right now, MW3 should be up to 1,750G, but it's at 1,385G, so I predict Collection Pack #4 will be 115G, bringing it to 1,500G. You heard it here first.
I'm sick of this ripoff bullshit from Activision. I've paid enough for this BS DLC. I'm not buying a CoD game again. There's plenty other games I can enjoy rather than wasting so much money on this utter tripe.
Activision need to get it into their heads that I don't give a flying fuck about their shit, repetitive multiplayer, so tehy should split the maps up, and just offer them for like 240MSP for each map. It would be much fairer, and cheaper for us.We are all here because we love achievements but there is a limit, maybe think about how much gameplay you get for your cash not how much gamerscore. |
Last post: 17 May at 16:45
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:50 |
Jake2355 said:I'm bothered that I can't complete this game without spending the cost of almost a complete new game. Someday I'll buy it...Why are you bothered? The game is considered complete when you get 1000/1000G on the original base game.
These DLC packs are nothing more than "added bonuses". In turn, DLC achievements are nothing more than added bonus points to those that are willing to spend hundreds of MSP on them. |
Last post: 18 Dec 12 at 22:15
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 20:55 |
| Completed it in 10 min, too easy. |
Last post: 08 Mar at 08:42
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 21:02 |
Phorty Ounce said:Jake2355 said:I'm bothered that I can't complete this game without spending the cost of almost a complete new game. Someday I'll buy it...Why are you bothered? The game is considered complete when you get 1000/1000G on the original base game.
These DLC packs are nothing more than "added bonuses". In turn, DLC achievements are nothing more than added bonus points to those that are willing to spend hundreds of MSP on them.No the game is not considered complete when you do that... It is more than fair enough to say you consider the game complete at that point but to say It is complete is a matter of opinion... |
Last post: 16 May at 01:14
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 21:08, Edited on 19 June 12 at 21:10 by Tony Starc |
People on here really have to realize that this entire site's userbase makes up less than 1% of the entire xbl userbase, they don't care about what you think about achievement values since most people don't care and buy it for the content itself. They will never let decisions be affected by achievements, ever.
And original 1k is the real completion, DLC is just bragging rights. I won't buy DLC if it's not worth it just for points/completions, and anyone who does has no right to complain about dlc pricing or release schedules since they're leading MS on by letting them think the dlc is being purchased for the content and not the points. |
Last post: 12 May at 23:30
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 21:20 |
| Its good to be a Founder! ^_^ |
Last post: 06 Mar at 02:13
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 21:41 |
For those of you complaining I see your point/s but at the end of the day surely you could have seen that Spec Ops had been worked on a lot more in MW3 than previous titles. With Elite coming out it was fairly obvious that some Spec ops maps with achievements would be released. Lots of you complain and say you hate the game but still rent it for the Gamerscore then bitch about it when they release 'overpriced dlc with achievements'. If you hate the game that much and think the DLC is overpriced then don't rent the game.
Back to the content itself. This Spec Ops mission was a bit trickier than the other DLC missions. The 3:30 achievement took me a while even on regular. |
Last post: 18 Dec 12 at 16:23
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 21:44 |
| spec ops mission will NOT work for me! I downloaded it and now i cant play any of the DLC levels!!! what the hell? |
Last post: 07 Sep 12 at 22:43
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 21:48 |
| BATZMANZ said:spec ops mission will NOT work for me! I downloaded it and now i cant play any of the DLC levels!!! what the hell?Remove the installed game from your HDD, that did the trick for me |
Last post: 18 May at 03:21
|
Posted on 19 June 12 at 22:18, Edited on 19 June 12 at 22:20 by Fuzzy Churro |
Tony Starc said:People on here really have to realize that this entire site's userbase makes up less than 1% of the entire xbl userbase, they don't care about what you think about achievement values since most people don't care and buy it for the content itself. They will never let decisions be affected by achievements, ever.
And original 1k is the real completion, DLC is just bragging rights. I won't buy DLC if it's not worth it just for points/completions, and anyone who does has no right to complain about dlc pricing or release schedules since they're leading MS on by letting them think the dlc is being purchased for the content and not the points.I couldnt have said it better myself. Recently ive been cutting back on buying DLC and either passing on it or waiting for it to go on sale. People should not complain about DLC, no one is forcing you to buy it and if you feel you have to buy it for the completion then thats your own fault, not Activisions or anyone elses for that matter. Anyways, I played the new maps with a buddy today and they're pretty fun and different. Especially the Intersection map. Oh! They hid some teddy bears in them too ;) |
"You've been hit by, you've been struck by, a smooth Churro!.." |