SheBeatsYou said:Think about it this way. Do you think Ubisoft would have allowed MS to lower Far Cry 3 to $3 like it was a few months ago? Hell no that was all Ubisoft. Artists sell their music for different prices based on how they sell. Why do you think Sony and Steam have better sales than MS? because more people use both platforms publishers and devs can afford to sell lower with a higher turnout.
I dunno how to explain it to you. 99% sure MS does not control their digital store prices.
If Ubisoft supply Far Cry 3 to Microsoft for $7 a copy and Microsoft sell it for $3, they still have to pay Ubisoft $7.
What are your thoughts about when a sale has different XBL Free and XBL Gold discounts? Do you think Ubisoft get less money from the people who paid the Gold discount price? Even though it is Microsoft that get the money from the Gold subs.
Same way when Microsoft set the price of a game to $0 for GwG, they still have to pay Ubisoft the agreed amount per download (or a negotiated lump sum - it is done case by case).
Then there was the time Warner Brothers games were marked as free in some regions by mistake. Do you think Microsoft didn’t have to pay WB?
Microsoft own and operate the store and are ultimately responsible for the prices, even though they have little control over the cost of the items from the supplier. And when any store states for a fact that $39.95 is cheaper than $34.80, it is the store that is misleading the customer, not the supplier.
Since neither you or I work for the MS store, we can both only be 99% sure. But I always have logical reasoning behind my point of view. I also enjoy a friendly difference of opinion. :)
He's not a man. He's the holy Half-Dead who has seen the Underverse and returned with powers you can't imagine.