Zeppelin041 said:Not that these games are big ones or anything but this is a Prime example as to why digital is not always the way to go but everyone in the world thinks it’s the greatest thing ever. At any moment the licenses can be pulled, stores can be closed, games can be removed, or it can get straight jacked like this….going completely digital being a gamer is a poor choice. Physical copies will always have value, if you’re spending thousands on games why not get something that could potentially be worth more in the future? Always go physical copy if you can.
For every Superman #1 and original boxed copy of System Shock 2 there’s literally 10s of thousands of games and comics that are completely worthless. The real main advantage of physical over digital is the ability to transfer the ownership of the item. Not really for sale, just to hand to a friend or whatever when you’re done.
I’m not against physical ownership, I used to be that way. Eventually I just realized it wasn’t for me and most of the supposed upsides were not what they were cracked up to be. I can carry an entire library of books on my phone, I can subscribe to the majority of DC or Marvel’s back catalog for under $10 a month. People buy so many video games they’ll never play that “backlog” is pretty much a running cultural joke. For rarer stuff my public library is still a thing, I’ve inter-library loaned more books than I can count, my brother even occasionally gets loaned rare architectural books shipped from Europe that way.
Archival is a strong argument, but as I’ve watched a lifetime of collected stuff and what really happens to it over time, I’ve realized why archivist is an actual degree in the library sciences and why it costs so much to maintain any museum collection (even a small university museum).