KJer25 said:EarthboundX said:KJer25 said:AC for me, started off as a great series that ultimately lost its way. The story became so convoluted and scattered. I do enjoy the core gameplay loop. I haven’t played any from Origins on but I’m thinking about jumping back in to Origins at some point. The Ubisoft formula just got a little stale for me.
Isn't Origins when the series changed a lot?
For sure. I’ve never played it though. I hear it’s more ARPG now, so seems like that’d be fun. It’s just grinding I hear is awful in Odyssey and Valhalla is supposedly bloated/filler.
I could handle the grinding in Odyssey. At least Cassandra was charming and held the story.
Valhalla, I’ve never been more disappointed in a game. I love anything Vikings. And absolutely adore the AC series (it’s in my top 3 gaming franchises). So combining Vikings and AC should’ve been an instant GotY for me. But what we got was just so, I don’t know, just devoid of soul is the only way to describe it. It was a lifeless world, with a bloated grind, and a cardboard protagonist.
Same thing happened with Watch Dogs Legion. Ubisoft used to be accused of cookie cutting year over year, but at least they were consistent in delivering descent games, with somewhat serviceable stories. But their last few titles just scream of a developer that’s given up caring on making these titles, and just doing it for the pay check.