sm182 said:PuckJunkie said:sm182 said:Reborn Insanity said:sm182 said:You'll be lucky if they even mention them in their reviews. That or one with a snarky comment about completionists.
Does anyone actually read the articles that the News Hounds put time into before they criticize them? Every official site review I have read has had a section or comment about the games achievements.
You do know that they edit articles if something relevant is brought up in the comments.
They do, but when they do, it typically says "updated today at 5:02" (for instance) in the byline next to the original timestamp. Even if the original author pulled some fast one on everyone by editing the post without that new info being added, it's worth noting that the first comment in this thread that mentions the unobtainables also makes reference to them already being noted in the article. You sure you didn't just miss the original author's mention of the unobtainables on your first read?
I was actually replying to Reborns point on reviews, I never thought there was anything wrong with this article.
Also regarding glitched achievements:
Poorly coded achievements = poorly coded game
Badly supported game = no future purchases from me
"Poorly coded" achievements does not mean the game is "poorly coded". Nor does something being "poorly coded" imply that it is a bad/buggy game in the first place. You can code something "poorly" and have it still work perfectly fine.