Editorials and Features

Forum for Editorials and other News Features

Yooka-Laylee Review

  • billbillbillbillbillbill1,360,883
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 12:09
    TheGreatKoala said:
    Bathtup47 said:
    Bathtup47 said:
    I'm not going to get political, but I still wish Jon was in this. That's not going to stop me from getting the game, though.
    Actually now that I remember, I didn't even know he was in it until I heard he was dropped.
    I had(and still have) no idea who he is
    Ha! Exact same for me. : )
  • Removed Gamer

    Removed Gamer

    Posted on 05 April 17 at 12:17
    Will definitely buy this.smile
  • Removed Gamer

    Removed Gamer

    Posted on 05 April 17 at 12:19
    Raz86 said:
    He expressed views that are naive, immature and at worst; ignorant.

    I agree with the backlash he has received because he is wrong and needs to be told so - but I remain a fan because I don't suddenly see him as a racist or a bad person. Just a bit silly; and aren't we all sometimes?
    I would say he is just a very bad debater and isn't able to articulate his points very well but there is a very legitimate case to be made against mass imigration and for a ethicly and culturally cohesive state. On the economic side there is the overproportional dependency on welfare and the suppression of wages and several different negative social and cultural effects.
    If you genuinely think opposing mass imigration is silly or racist I would advise you to read Milton Friedman for the economic aspects and Robert Putnams "Diversity and Community in the 21st century" for the social aspects.
    I won't claim here they are 100% right but there is at least a legitimate argument to be made that support what Jontron presumably argues for.
    I definately agree that Jontron isn't a racist. In fact I would claim that despite all the fuzz about it racism is pretty much a neglectable factor in explaining overall social phenomenons.
  • Elite1111111111Elite11111111111,156,983
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 12:25, Edited on 05 April 17 at 12:35 by Elite1111111111
    Think this is the highest review I've seen of it so far. I like how most reviews online are dogging it for being what it's supposed to be.
  • Posted on 05 April 17 at 12:49, Edited on 05 April 17 at 12:52 by TheGreatKoala
    Fanta Morgana said:
    Raz86 said:
    He expressed views that are naive, immature and at worst; ignorant.

    I agree with the backlash he has received because he is wrong and needs to be told so - but I remain a fan because I don't suddenly see him as a racist or a bad person. Just a bit silly; and aren't we all sometimes?
    I would say he is just a very bad debater and isn't able to articulate his points very well but there is a very legitimate case to be made against mass imigration and for a ethicly and culturally cohesive state. On the economic side there is the overproportional dependency on welfare and the suppression of wages and several different negative social and cultural effects.
    If you genuinely think opposing mass imigration is silly or racist I would advise you to read Milton Friedman for the economic aspects and Robert Putnams "Diversity and Community in the 21st century" for the social aspects.
    I won't claim here they are 100% right but there is at least a legitimate argument to be made that support what Jontron presumably argues for.
    I definately agree that Jontron isn't a racist. In fact I would claim that despite all the fuzz about it racism is pretty much a neglectable factor in explaining overall social phenomenons.
    It's already been established that this subject is not open for discussion in this forum, and is against the ToS(something I didn't realise until after my post earlier)
  • thearyadragonthearyadragon2,820,826
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 12:59, Edited on 05 April 17 at 13:33 by thearyadragon
    TheGreatKoala said:
    Fanta Morgana said:
    Raz86 said:
    He expressed views that are naive, immature and at worst; ignorant.

    I agree with the backlash he has received because he is wrong and needs to be told so - but I remain a fan because I don't suddenly see him as a racist or a bad person. Just a bit silly; and aren't we all sometimes?
    I would say he is just a very bad debater and isn't able to articulate his points very well but there is a very legitimate case to be made against mass imigration and for a ethicly and culturally cohesive state. On the economic side there is the overproportional dependency on welfare and the suppression of wages and several different negative social and cultural effects.
    If you genuinely think opposing mass imigration is silly or racist I would advise you to read Milton Friedman for the economic aspects and Robert Putnams "Diversity and Community in the 21st century" for the social aspects.
    I won't claim here they are 100% right but there is at least a legitimate argument to be made that support what Jontron presumably argues for.
    I definately agree that Jontron isn't a racist. In fact I would claim that despite all the fuzz about it racism is pretty much a neglectable factor in explaining overall social phenomenons.
    It's already been established that this subject is not open for discussion in this forum, and is against the ToS(something I didn't realise until after my post earlier)
    Yet you already discussed it when you said "being a racist or supporting a racist."
    Huh. If anyone should be pointing that out, why should it be you?
  • PrisPris2,181,302
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 13:24
    This game is looking exactly what I was expecting/hoping it would be. Can't wait personally. I just hope that now I'm 28 this will still have the same charm as when I played the Banjo games all those years ago.
  • Zorlac0666Zorlac0666222,947
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 13:26
    Dark Death 90 said:
    Interesting to see such a positive review. My opinion on it lines up closer with Jim Sterling's 2/10... and I'm someone who was pretty excited for it. The controls are awful to me, and I found nearly every bit of humor in the parts I played cringey at best and mind numbingly irritating at worst.

    But y'know, different strokes and all that. Glad some people are getting enjoyment out of it. Just wish I was one of those people.
    Have you played it?
  • Posted on 05 April 17 at 13:51, Edited on 05 April 17 at 13:53 by TheGreatKoala
    Quickdontdie said:
    TheGreatKoala said:
    Fanta Morgana said:
    Raz86 said:
    He expressed views that are naive, immature and at worst; ignorant.

    I agree with the backlash he has received because he is wrong and needs to be told so - but I remain a fan because I don't suddenly see him as a racist or a bad person. Just a bit silly; and aren't we all sometimes?
    I would say he is just a very bad debater and isn't able to articulate his points very well but there is a very legitimate case to be made against mass imigration and for a ethicly and culturally cohesive state. On the economic side there is the overproportional dependency on welfare and the suppression of wages and several different negative social and cultural effects.
    If you genuinely think opposing mass imigration is silly or racist I would advise you to read Milton Friedman for the economic aspects and Robert Putnams "Diversity and Community in the 21st century" for the social aspects.
    I won't claim here they are 100% right but there is at least a legitimate argument to be made that support what Jontron presumably argues for.
    I definately agree that Jontron isn't a racist. In fact I would claim that despite all the fuzz about it racism is pretty much a neglectable factor in explaining overall social phenomenons.
    It's already been established that this subject is not open for discussion in this forum, and is against the ToS(something I didn't realise until after my post earlier)
    Yet you already discussed it when you said "being a racist or supporting a racist."
    Huh. If anyone should be pointing that out, why should it be you?
    If you read the entire topic after my "being a racist or supporting a racist." post, you will see the following points:

    TheGreatKoala said:
    Elyoh said:
    I game to get away from a lot of this political crap, why do people insist on dragging it through here? It has no affect on the actual game.
    Fair Point, apologies
    And

    TheGreatKoala said:
    (something I didn't realise until after my post earlier)
    Clearly showing the topic is not open for discussion and clearly showing I have realised my mistake in responding to it to begin with smile

    EDIT: And I haven't deleted the post because it's part of the conversation now, so the topic is disjointed
  • thearyadragonthearyadragon2,820,826
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 13:56
    TheGreatKoala said:
    Quickdontdie said:
    TheGreatKoala said:
    Fanta Morgana said:
    Raz86 said:
    He expressed views that are naive, immature and at worst; ignorant.

    I agree with the backlash he has received because he is wrong and needs to be told so - but I remain a fan because I don't suddenly see him as a racist or a bad person. Just a bit silly; and aren't we all sometimes?
    I would say he is just a very bad debater and isn't able to articulate his points very well but there is a very legitimate case to be made against mass imigration and for a ethicly and culturally cohesive state. On the economic side there is the overproportional dependency on welfare and the suppression of wages and several different negative social and cultural effects.
    If you genuinely think opposing mass imigration is silly or racist I would advise you to read Milton Friedman for the economic aspects and Robert Putnams "Diversity and Community in the 21st century" for the social aspects.
    I won't claim here they are 100% right but there is at least a legitimate argument to be made that support what Jontron presumably argues for.
    I definately agree that Jontron isn't a racist. In fact I would claim that despite all the fuzz about it racism is pretty much a neglectable factor in explaining overall social phenomenons.
    It's already been established that this subject is not open for discussion in this forum, and is against the ToS(something I didn't realise until after my post earlier)
    Yet you already discussed it when you said "being a racist or supporting a racist."
    Huh. If anyone should be pointing that out, why should it be you?
    If you read the entire topic after my "being a racist or supporting a racist." post, you will see the following points:

    TheGreatKoala said:
    Elyoh said:
    I game to get away from a lot of this political crap, why do people insist on dragging it through here? It has no affect on the actual game.
    Fair Point, apologies
    And

    TheGreatKoala said:
    (something I didn't realise until after my post earlier)
    Clearly showing the topic is not open for discussion and clearly showing I have realised my mistake in responding to it to begin with smile

    EDIT: And I haven't deleted the post because it's part of the conversation now, so the topic is disjointed
    Alright, I was quick to point you out. Too much political garble to read through! wave
  • Posted on 05 April 17 at 13:59
    Quickdontdie said:
    Alright, I was quick to point you out. Too much political garble to read through! wave
    smile

    OT, Yep, I'm totally seeing the Gru resemblance on Capital B
  • Page DaemonPage Daemon506,547
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 14:33
    Really looking forward to this, regardless of crappy camera controls or framerate issues. We've finally got a "sequel" to Banjo-Tooie and that's all I care about.
    Page
  • PurcePurce409,472
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 14:58
    This is hands down the most positive review I've seen yet. The camera messing up shouldn't be ignored, but I feel it's only gonna remind me of playing an old N64 game, which is what I wanted in the first place. Beyond excited about this game.
  • thearyadragonthearyadragon2,820,826
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 14:59
    Purce said:
    This is hands down the most positive review I've seen yet. The camera messing up shouldn't be ignored, but I feel it's only gonna remind me of playing an old N64 game, which is what I wanted in the first place. Beyond excited about this game.
    I mean I'd personally just prefer a good camera over a bad one, the bad one being retro doesn't help much.
  • misfit119misfit1191,179,104
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 16:13, Edited on 05 April 17 at 16:14 by misfit119
    Elyoh said:
    I game to get away from a lot of this political crap, why do people insist on dragging it through here? It has no affect on the actual game.
    The only reason I brought it up is because he did a voice for the game and got patched out due to his statements. So I was genuinely curious about what part of the "JonTron thing" pissed them off. I'm not trying to debate the merits of capitalism over socialism here but when it relates to games and changes to their development it seems fair game. Especially since it did have an effect on the game - him getting removed from it.

    Quickdontdie said:
    Purce said:
    This is hands down the most positive review I've seen yet. The camera messing up shouldn't be ignored, but I feel it's only gonna remind me of playing an old N64 game, which is what I wanted in the first place. Beyond excited about this game.
    I mean I'd personally just prefer a good camera over a bad one, the bad one being retro doesn't help much.
    It depends. People loved the re-release of the old Banjo-Kazooie games. So releasing a game in that same vein doesn't really seem like the worst idea.
    Looking to boost any MP achievements I don't have for any game I own.
  • FlattmeisterFlattmeister469,414
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 16:17
    Fanta Morgana said:
    Raz86 said:
    He expressed views that are naive, immature and at worst; ignorant.

    I agree with the backlash he has received because he is wrong and needs to be told so - but I remain a fan because I don't suddenly see him as a racist or a bad person. Just a bit silly; and aren't we all sometimes?
    I would say he is just a very bad debater and isn't able to articulate his points very well but there is a very legitimate case to be made against mass imigration and for a ethicly and culturally cohesive state. On the economic side there is the overproportional dependency on welfare and the suppression of wages and several different negative social and cultural effects.
    If you genuinely think opposing mass imigration is silly or racist I would advise you to read Milton Friedman for the economic aspects and Robert Putnams "Diversity and Community in the 21st century" for the social aspects.
    I won't claim here they are 100% right but there is at least a legitimate argument to be made that support what Jontron presumably argues for.
    I definately agree that Jontron isn't a racist. In fact I would claim that despite all the fuzz about it racism is pretty much a neglectable factor in explaining overall social phenomenons.
    I agree with you completely there, JonTron made some claims that were false or poorly sourced. The regressive leftist media has created this divisiveness that simply opposing or being critical of forced mass immigration; you're labelled a racist, a facist, a Nazi. They throw labels at people and it's prevented civil discourse.
    I blame Polygon, Kotaku and all the other corrupt games media sites for pressuring PlayTonic studios for removing JonTron from the game. If they'd have not said anything to the studio, they'd have been none of this controversy and outrage.
    I'm a classical liberal person with some right leaning opinions on some issues. I enjoy Arnold Schwartzenegger movies and he's right wing conservative, his personal political opinions don't stop me from enjoying his films and I don't go around telling movie studios to stop casting him in roles.
    Toasty!
  • Posted on 05 April 17 at 16:37
    Hi guys,

    Instead of removing the posts, because we feel they are still constructive, we have left them alone. Yes, they are off topic and venture in to the "no politics" territory, but they don't get uncivil.

    Moving forward in this thread, let's keep the discussion on topic and relevant to Yooka-Laylee.

    Thank you!
    Ask me about my rock collection.
  • FluffytoastFluffytoast1,310,948
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 17:06
    As a long time Banjo and 3D platformer fan, I've been used to dodgy cameras and awkward swimming for a while now, so neither of those problems are enough to put me off.

    I do however have my expectations tempered, being how this is a Kickstarted 'spiritual successor', but juding by most gameplay, it seems to be vastly more... honest than say, Mighty No 9.
  • I KICKER II KICKER I2,283,556
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 18:05
    most reviews ive seen so far on this game are so funny they hate the game because the successor to banjo game looks and play like banjo...

    your review is the best so far in my opinion.
    im glad to help people in online achievement as long they help me too XD
  • MugenKairoMugenKairo329,325
    Posted on 05 April 17 at 21:03
    XBA reviews ew only gave the game 55/100, which is pretty low even for them. I was going to get this right away. It wait for a patch to fix the controls issues and bugs.
    'Life begins beyond the edge of your comfort zone'
Want to join in the discussion? Please log in or Register For Free to comment.
Hide ads
Hide ads