CyberKnight308,110 (177,685)

I think it would work better if it was completely anonymous. Some are 'embarrassed' that it took them so long and so they don't 'vote.'

Or people will put a time they think they would of got for what ever reason. I usually just put the time it shows played on my Xbox One games

Or if i play a game all the way through from start to finish ill put time difference between first and last earned achievements

Although I will say this, many times I was sure ppl were lying about times but sure enough the estimate will be dead on accurate by a matter of <30 mins

Time Spent: < 1 hour. Actual time spent: 80 hours, with all 80 of them done by macro.

I love how DCUO is now showing "0-1 hour" for its completion time. Might need a caveat to show that costs $100 or whatever.

^ I don't mind that as much, for like 2006 fifa world cup or DCUO because that is the accurate fastest possible completion time at least, but it's worst with games that

realistically take more like 5-8 hours but people put down at 1-4 type thing that is just bad

personally speaking, I tend to leave my box on all day if I'm off work and am only actually gaming like half that time, so my times probably tend to be higher than

they actually are and wouldn't surprise me if that's fairly common

^yeah i do the same

I tend to complete games faster than what they say they are. So maybe the people putting in the time are just better at the game.

^ nah we've discussed this several times and you've agreed with the OP. I forget the examples exactly, but remember things like Clash? and maybe some of the point&click

I know we have but for example platformers I usually complete faster because I'm better than the average gamer at them.

Nice!

Amazing!