DeadBrock has won 5,870 Achievements and 8 Challenges in 148 games and 3 apps
Registered on 28 Jan 15
| Last visited 06 Sep 15 | Last scanned on 26 July 17 at 10:58 by TA Scanner 7
You do know you can't increase your TA ratio with Playstation games though, right?
30 other comments
Ratio is meaningless below 250,000 gamerscore ;)
DMC4 really rose my ratio
I'm contradicting my previous stance there actually. Ratio is always meaningless. ;) But MORE meaningless the lower the gs total.
Imagine how high your ratio would be if you finished Paranutical Activity.
Gamerscore is also meaningless outside of this site to most of the general Xbox population, so ratio is relevant on this site
If you play like 4 games and have a 10 ratio that's as meaningless as having over 500K GS with hour long indie games.
Gamerscore is the least meaningful stat. Easy/Quick completions could probably get you all the way up to 600k or higher, I bet.
If u reach a 4.0 with at least 200k GS that would good
I think that anyone below 100 000 shouldn't even talk about ratio.
Yeah, i should just say screw my 99.7 percent completion and just get a ton of gamerscore and ratio. 200K with 40 percent completion 4.5 ratio.
I'll avoid the easy achievements and just go for the HARD ones!
Quality over quantity. If someone completes a low amount of game but actually has top quality games, I'd respect them more.
Yeah but ratio doesnt equate to quality or difficulty. The stark contrast between 360 ratios and xb1 ratios is evidence of that
And i agree gs is meaningless too.
It goes both ways though. There are One games that don't have a high enough ratio because so few people have started them. You're right about quality/difficulty though.
Ratio is purely rarity. Some difficult achievements do have a decent ratio on them, but it's not always the case. Some are RNG based/grindy/hard etc.
A large impact is also on how good the game is and how fast/easy the first achievement is, the first achievement is how anyone is scanned into the calculation.
If it is a really boring/horrible game that has an achievement for loading it up then it will be inflated. Price matters as well, if it was free than we have a good
Yeah.. playing god awful games just for ratio = lame. Quality over quantity is were it's at. Unfortunately my early gs career is loaded with embarrassing shit
Ratio is a number, very small amounts of people actually look at the games that make the ratio.
Anyone that plays any type of game just for a number is stupid. Easy GS or ratio.
I agree that ratio is purely rarity, which is why it's so odd to me that some folks here pursue it so fervently. Then again I used to pursue that stupid number by my tag
So I guess I'm just a black pot thumbing my nose at that dumb black kettle like I'm some highly evolved hunk of metal or something.
I mean, there's nothing wrong with it if that's what makes someone happy, but trying to brag about it or gaining any sense of superiority because of it is dumb.
What just happened? <br/>Is it straight if I make my push for the 200k 4.0 Ratio or what? <br/>I need your support TA!!!!
If you post shitty bait one more time, I post your mugshot
https://www.truetrophies.com/gamer/ChemicalSlave <----- read bio
Haven't heard the name "Giantluca" in a long time.
And your point is...what exactly?
Just about time for me to stop playing then. I don't really care for the competitive scene.
^ I'm just here for solo and coop.Just for fun and challenging solo games :)
13 other comments
Phil Spencer said something about them focusing on online only multiplayer games from here on out.
I doubt that. He just spoke about episodic story based games.
Very much doubt it, because you're the one currently saying it.
Yeah that aint happening. For every big success story like Overwatch there are tons of MP only games that fail outright or limp along with a meager player base.
I laughed my ass off when people said Evolve would be the next big thing. There is a place for MP only games, sur3, but SP and Coop arent going anywhere
That's not even close to what he said. He did say Sony focuses on big single player games and it takes something special to make that work.
He also said games as a service is where the players have moved to now.
But he also said the service part works only in certain games.
Yeah, I'd love to see more games like Overwatch and Rainbow Six Siege.
XBOX for Muliplayer and PS4 for single-player.. I'm down with that..
That's what I'm saying!!! I'll buy all consoles day one, always have. Scorpio will make 3rd party games look awesome.
Or you know, it wont actually be that way.
10 achievements out of 42 won | 32,087 tracked gamers have this game | Last played 25 Jul 17
7 achievements out of 12 won | 54,944 tracked gamers have this game | Last played 17 Jun 17
1 achievement out of 12 won | 16,734 tracked gamers have this game | Last played 17 Jun 17
Copyright © 2017 TrueGaming Network
Ltd, All Rights Reserved
Xbox, Xbox Live, and all other Xbox Live specific terms are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corp.
TrueAchievements is a proud member of the Xbox Community Developer Program
Concept, Design, Programming and Server Stuff by Rich Stone
Site version: 5.0.2, also available on Mobile